I’m working on a Political Science question and need guidance to help me study.
As you are reading through Volkomer Ch. 2, “From Colonialism to Constitutionalism,” give here your rollnig analysis of the essay’s major claims, arguments, and evidence. In some ways, if you grew up in the United States, this story must seem familiar. Yet, I want you to really push yourself factually and conceptually here to develop your own new-to-you paradigm view of this story. How might you see this tale differently as a result of closely attending to Volkomer’s factual and interpretative specifics?