This article covers NURS 6053 Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Permalink: https://thestudycorp.com/workplace-environment-assessment
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.
NURS 6053 Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
How healthy is your workplace?
You may believe that your existing company runs smoothly, or you may believe that it has numerous flaws. You may encounter or perhaps observe something that causes you to pause. Nonetheless, just as you would not attempt to diagnose a patient solely on the basis of observation, you should refrain from attempting to assess the health of your work environment solely on the basis of observation and opinion. Often, difficulties are perceived as problems by some but not by others; similarly, concerns may run far deeper than leadership understands.
Click here ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility.
NURS 6053 Assignment Workplace Environment Assessment Slayers
While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
ASSIGNMENT
Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.
Required Readings
Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation” (pp. 121–144)
Chapter 9, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 247–278)
Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 279–298)
Select at least ONE of the following:
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)
attachmentRE: Discussion – Week 7, main postCollapse
When I think of civility, several words come to mind: courtesy, respect, compliance, affability, dignity, responsibility, kindness, attention, creativity, tact, and many more. All these words have a significant meaning and are abundant in many people’s lives. Sadly, observing today’s world, it is evident that many of us have forgotten about civility, not only in their personal lives but even in the workplace, which is unfortunate since research established that workplace civility increases productivity and employees’ satisfaction and retention (Beck, 2018). In this discussion, I will present the results of my organization’s work environment assessment based on my current working conditions, provide examples of incivility, and how they were addressed.
Work Environment Assessment
To promote a healthy work environment, the organization should promote a culture of respectful communication, fairness, openness, kindness, tact, and attention (Clark, 2015). However, not all businesses care about persevering those fundamental values. Studies have shown that incivility in the workplace is common and frequently ignored (Clark, Olender, Cardoni & Kenski, 2011).
Unfortunately, based on my experience and observation, this statement happens to be true. Currently, I only work part-time as a registry nurse, so when I took Clark’s Healthy Workplace Inventory Assessment, I concentrated on my past organization, where I worked as full-time staff. The assessment revealed that, in fact, I used to work in a very unhealthy place.
My Workplace Was an Uncivil Place
Although the hospital for which I worked had a set of rules, morals, vision, and mission, it rarely abided by their orated values. They did not concentrate on retaining the best and the brightest, they were not providing any emphasis on employee wellness and self-care. They also did not treat employees fairly and courteously, as well as the workload was often unfairly distributed among nurses based on who was the charge nurse’s favorite. There were many more “do’s and don’ts,” but if I wanted to mention all of them, it would be quite a list. Some of the pertinent examples I would like to explore further are uneven distribution of workload and lack of managerial/organizational support in employees’ wellness.
Uneven Distribution of Workload
I noticed that many hospitals do not value seasonal nurses. For many years I have been a nurse traveler or registry, as well as once I took a permanent position. As a seasonal nurse, I was given the most hectic assignments and often not offered any guidance or help. My breaks were offered as last with other travelers or registry, and most of the time, I did not get all of them as set by California law. When I inquired about over time based on those incidents, it was frowned upon, and often not approved. To keep my income, I knew I had to be quiet and not bring attention to my issues. I was not allowed to speak up, because once I did, my contract was immediately canceled.
However, the incivility of organizations for which I worked as a traveler did not differ much from experience of a permanent position. Since I love medicine and nursing, and I consider it my passion, not a job, my charge nurses were overloading me with high ICU acuity patients stating that ‘Annette is capable of handling this.’ In contrast, other nurses were given ‘easy’ assignments and often spending most of their shift cruising the news on their cellphones or chatting in the nursing station’s corners. Receiving any help was nearly impossible to achieve.
Lack of managerial/organizational support in employees’ wellness.
Another example of organizational incivility is based on a case from my last permanent workplace where I cared for a patient who suffered brain death during hospitalization. I cannot describe the story in full since HIPPA protects it, but the result was that my dear colleague and myself needed wellness care because we both suffered PTSD. Our manager told us we should reach out to our health department, but when we did, several times, no one ever returned our calls. When we tried asking our manager for help in arranging a consultation, we received no answer. My colleague ended up getting psychological help from her private insurance and took three weeks of a medical leave of absence, but I decided to power through. Sometimes I cried unexpectedly, even at work, when I thought of that unfortunate tragic case, which by the way, was not a nursing mistake, but the knowledge of what went wrong and how the death of that patient could have been prevented was emotionally damaging. In the end, no one spoke to us about that, no one reached out. Management did not help arrange for wellness consultation, and we were entirely on our own.
I will never forget that case, but specifically, I will never forget how coldly and inattentively my organization treated us. At that moment, I realized that this was not a place I wanted to continue to work for, and I started weighing my options and looking for another job. I eventually left, so did my colleague.
Conclusion
Civility is a set of morals, values, and traits that one must possess to succeed in personal and professional life. Civility is kindness, mindful communication, listening, and consciousness. It is respect, responsibility, and ethics. Civilized leaders are invaluable examples to others and a stellar foundation of any organization.
Reference:
Beck, E. (2018). Workplace civility increases productivity. National Institutes of Health 70(16). https://nihrecord.nih.gov/2018/08/10/workplace-civility-increases-productivity
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering Civility in Nursing Education and Practice: Nurse Leader Perspectives. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c
Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23.
https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf
SummaryofResults-ClarkHealthyWorkplaceAssessment.docx
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Workplace Environment Assessment)
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Workplace Environment Assessment)
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Work Environment Assessment· Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template. · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace. | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. | Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace. | Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided.The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing.The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. |
| Part 2: Reviewing the Literature· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. · Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. | Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses. | Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific examples are provided which may support the responses. | Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Specific examples are not provided to support the responses. |
| Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. · Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. | Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. | Points Range: 16 (16%) – 19 (19%)The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. | Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
Read More:
