Capstone Project Literature Review – Solved Example


This article provides a sample solution about Capstone Project Literature Review.

Permalink: https://thestudycorp.com/capstone-project-literature-review

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Capstone Project Literature Review)

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

Solution

Capstone Project Literature Review

Introduction

Nursing practice of the 21st century and beyond has an evidence-based practice as the guiding mantra across all settings. Snyder (2019) contends that building one’s research and connecting it to existing knowledge is the building that supports all academic research activities, their discipline notwithstanding. Scholars in the profession admit that randomized control trials (RCTs) for the gold standard for testing proposed interventions, but the publication of each represents the findings and conclusions of only one study offering their evidence. As such, scientific integrative, systematic, and meta-analytical literature reviews constitute the backbone of publications that act as the powerhouse of EBP. Suffice it to say that the literature reviews, once scientifically conducted, offer essential evidence necessitating authors to publish the literature reviews that show credible support to their studies. Besides the peer-reviewed articles published in reputable scholarly journals, other significant guides to research include but are not limited to official and non-official agencies like the CDC, WHO, OECD that are credible.  Consequently, the purpose of the aim of this essay is to present a literature review of selected articles that support the PICOT statement In ICU patients, how effective is it to remove Foley catheters within 24-72 hours in preventing infection versus intermittent catheterization in decreasing the incidence of infection within 90 days? To achieve the objective, the articles under review are reviewed by comparing the research questions, the sample population, and the study limitations before concluding with an overview of the study and how they relate to the PICOT questing guiding this topic.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Capstone Project Literature Review)

A Comparison of Research Questions

            In the study conducted by Andrade et al. (2016), the researchers sought to address the research question on what strategies health professionals use to implement the CDC guidelines to prevent urinary infections related to catheter use. This question complements Barbara’s (2020) research hypothesis that asserted implementation of a rounding checklist in the ICU reduces the number of CAUTI cases. The findings and conclusions are relevant to the current in that Foley catheters’ efficacy can be compared or projected against these. On the other hand, Sandhu et al. (2018) hypothesized that identifying and determining microbial patterns of susceptibility to prophylactics would offer baseline information on the incidence of CAUTI. This hypothesis sheds light on how to increase knowledge on the microbes that would colonize a catheter is bound to further inform the current study on Foley catheters. Lastly, Atkins et al. (2020), while different from the other three, connect to all three in that it delves into the behavioral barriers and facilitators that the current CAUTI reduction interview measures encounter. The demonstration of the efficacy of the two research hypotheses and two research questions, when combined, will give the researcher a wide array of information.

A Comparison of Sample Populations

            In the qualitative and mixed methodology studies approach adopted by Andrade et al. (2016) and Atkins et al. (2020), respectively, the sample population of the articles reviewed had the setting of the systematic review in the USA and England. Andrade et al. (2016) reviewed 13 quantitative studies where each study highlighted the decrease of UTIs related to catheterism through reminder systems. The articles also addressed audits on nursing professionals’ practice guidelines and the expansion of bundles. Atkins et al. (2020), while using a mixed-method approach, had the qualitative section of their study systematically analyze articles published between 1995 and 2017 of studies on the barriers and facilitators of CAUTI- related behaviors in England performed by healthcare providers in the primary, secondary and community care or nursing homes in England. Unlike the study Andrade et al. (2016) that exclusively dealt with quantitative studies, the latter analyzed all qualitative, quantitative, or mixed types.  Eleven of these studies were identified. In Barbara’s (2020) quantitative study, the sample population was 15 886 patients diagnosed with CAUTI while in the ICU of a 16 – bed Academic community hospital. Sandhu et al. (2020) study had a total of 161 patients in Indonesia.  The common rubric in all these studies was that all sought to decrease the incidence of CAUTI to reduce mortality and increased length of stay in hospitals, amongst other outcomes.

A Comparison of the Limitations of the Study

            In their study, Andrade (2016) pointed out that their study’s limitations were their sample selection, which was done by only one reviewer, and nurse descriptors’ usage. The researcher suggests that a researcher could have the review done by more than review over this challenge. Atkins et al. (2020) highlight five limitations to their study, with the first being use of bundles instead of specific behaviors, the second limitation was that the study was a secondary content analysis of published literature while the third limitation was that studies focusing on barriers and strengths were conducted in the US and not the UK itself. Linking the identified barriers and facilitators to CAUTI prevention behaviors was done at the aggregate level instead of the individual level to indicate the seized, and missed opportunities for the intervention was identified as the fourth limitation. The fifth and last of the limitations specific to this study is that the TDF domain times BCT pairing form the basis of congruence result from expert consensus and therefore do not distinguish between theoretically congruent pairings. Amongst other limitations, Barbara (2020) points out the use of a small and pre and post-study design prone to unmeasured consequences of confounding variables. Likewise, Sadhu et al. (2020) report using a limited number of samples due to the researcher’s limited time. Taken in their totality, the limitations stated in each of the studies is important since it will inform the pitfalls this research will have to avoid by using the strategies that would reduce or prevent the impact of each limitation as these if not addresses world affect the validity and reliability of the findings.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Capstone Project Literature Review)

Capstone Project Literature Review
Capstone Project Literature Review

Conclusion

            In conclusion, this literature review has determined enough literature to support the implementation of the proposed intervention to prevent and reduce the incidence of UTIs attributed to catheterism using Foley catheters. The researcher has to remember that a thorough and insightful literature review acts as the basis for knowledge development, formulation of new guidelines for policy and practice and avail evidence of an effect, and if found to be feasible, inculcate new ideas and directions in the nursing field as far as catheterism is concerned. The literature review further notes that each of the articles calls for more studies in the future to address various aspects of the use of catheters in healthcare and the development of measures and strategies based that are evidence-based to prevent and reduce hospital-acquired infections related to catheterism.

References

Andrade, V. L. F., & Fernandes, F. A. V. (2016). Prevención de la infección del tracto urinario asociada al cateterismo: estrategias en la implementación de las directrices internacionales. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem24. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v24/0104-1169-rlae-0963-2678.pdf

Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., … & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioral analysis of interventions. Implementation Science15(1), 1-22. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2

Barbara Pashnik, R. N. (2020). Intensive care unit rounding checklists to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology1, 4.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339694453_Intensive_care_unit_rounding_checklists_to_reduce_catheter-associated_urinary_tract_infections

Sandhu, R., Sayal, P., Jakkhar, R., & Sharma, G. (2018). Catheterization-associated urinary tract infections: Epidemiology and incidence from tertiary care hospital in Haryana. Journal of Health Research and Reviews5(3), 135. https://www.jhrr.org/article.asp?issn=2394-2010;year=2018;volume=5;issue=3;spage=135;epage=141;aulast=Sandhu;type=3

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research104, 333-339.

Question – Capstone Project Literature Review

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Capstone Project Literature Review)

Capstone Project Literature Review
Capstone Project Literature Review

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1.     Title page

2.     Introduction section

3.     A comparison of research questions

4.     A comparison of sample populations

5.     A comparison of the limitations of the study

6.     A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Read More:

https://thestudycorp.com/literature-evaluation-table-solved/
https://thestudycorp.com/professional-capstone-and-practicum-reflective-journal/

All Solved Essays

Does this Look Like Your Assignment? We Can do an Original Paper for you!

Have no Time to Write? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​