This article covers Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis.
Permalink: https://thestudycorp.com/academic-success-and-professional-development-plan
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Hence research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in support of locating and analyzing research.
- Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic of interest to you in your specialty field.
- Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts as described by the article
The Assignment:
Using the ‘Week 4 | Part 4’ section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
- Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.
- Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
- Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
- Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
- Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.
- Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
- Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
- Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
- Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
- Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary.
Step 2: Summary of Analysis
Craft a summary (2-3 paragraph) below that includes the following:
- Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research
- Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research
- Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research
I would recommend the article by Farmanova, Bonneville, and Bouchard (2018) to inform practice based on two rationales. First, grounded on the foundation of the research question. The question reflects an addition of knowledge concerning health literacy by persuading the reader that the selection of the research question is non-trivial and follows an existing literature on the topic. The other rationale is based on the methods used to justify the intended suitability for producing reliable and valid evidence to answer the research question. In addition, the authors typically present the Method section, where the process of conducting the study is given clearly. Moreover, results and analyses provide consistent responses to the study question and data collected. Hence, the study is reliable and valid for a scientific research.
Step 2: Summary of Analysis
My approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research involves activities such as identification, understanding, recording, meaning-making, and information transmission of articles to a topic of interest. The search starts by seeking and examining peer-reviewed publications with information from the course readings. Most scholarly research articles are found in journals (Simmons et al., 2020). Then it would proceeds looking for clues to indicate that the author(s) is a researcher or scholar. I pay closer attention to authors’ credential written behind their names. Next is to check whether the original purpose of the article is for the original research or to further the readers’ understanding about a given topic. Another proper strategy is locating the methods section by paying attention to key words like peer-reviewed, qualitative, and quantitative.
Strategies that I find effective in locating peer-reviewed research is to use a specific database that is particular to an area of study. Consequently, it is essential to plan the research while highlighting key words pulled from the research question. As there are a number of articles, it becomes helpful to make use of filters to narrow down the searches for the previous five years and to provide full-text articles. One important thing about using Walden University Library is the separation of databases based on one’s academic year of study. I choose to use CINAHL Plus since it has journals tailored for nursing and other health professionals. For that reason, I intend to use CINAHL as it is user-friendly and allows one to choose only peer-reviewed articles. The site also has an excellent webinar transcript to show how to navigate by using main and subtopics for narrowing down the search.
References
Farmanova, E., Bonneville, L., & Bouchard, L. (January 01, 2018). Organizational health literacy: Review of theories, frameworks, guides, and implementation issues. Inquiry (United States), 55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958018757848
Simmons, S. C., Bui, C. M., Kim, C. H., Feldman, A. Z., Staley, E. M., & Pham, H. P. (January 01, 2020). Frequency of Alterations in Apheresis-Related Abstracts Prior to Publications as Peer-Reviewed Articles. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 24, 2, 215-220. DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12866
Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
By Day 7
Submit your analysis, including your competed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections including your matrix and summary.
Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 4 Assignment
Next Week
To go to the next week:
Week 5
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and
Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942
Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from
https://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/embed/#?secret=Fnpr4MNsDz
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019,
from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research.
Retrieved October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your
sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesi
zing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved October 12,
2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved October
12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)
Document: Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing:
Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips
for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success Program Transcript
FEMALE SPEAKER: Research and writing is a significant part of your academic experience at Walden. Many incoming students are competent at professional writing, but it’s important to remember that it’s very different from scholarly writing. Professional writing is based on experience, but scholarly writing is based on evidence. We anticipate some of the challenges you may face in scholarly writing, so here are a few tips for success.
In scholarly writing, you must identify who the audience is for your writing, and find your scholarly voice to present your research findings in an academically appropriate manner. You writing should be clear, concise, evidence-based, and objective.
Another common challenge many students face is very basic, but very manageable– the fear of writing. First, it’s necessary to identify your fears. Perhaps you received negative feedback in the past and it felt personal. Maybe you feel like you need your writing to be absolutely perfect, or that you’re the only one struggling to grasp a concept or technique.
I can assure you, you are not alone. Walden wants to help you succeed. The Walden Writing Center website, along with faculty, are available to guide you, advise you, and give the feedback necessary to help you grow and mature as a writer. Feedback is a crucial component to improve your writing, so don’t let it scare you. Ask for feedback from people you trust– your classmates, faculty, friends, or colleagues. Becoming a better writer is an ongoing, lifelong process. The more comfortable you are with receiving and implementing feedback and the revision process, the better your writing skills will become.
Another tip is to remember that it’s important to celebrate each victory you have along the way. When you finish your course or complete a paper, give yourself the credit you deserve for the accomplishment.
Last, and perhaps the most important, find your passion. Time management and persistence are important tools for finishing your degree, but the passion that drives you toward your goal is the fire that can help keep you motivated. Mountains of reading and long nights of writing are achievable if you ignite the passion for your work.
You’ve come to Walden to make a difference in yourself and in your community. Strive for excellence in your research and writing, and Walden will help guide you on the path that you choose.
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Academic Success and Professional Development Plan)
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
· The topic of interest you have selected.
· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.
The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.
The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.
Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
· Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.
Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research
· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
· Iintegrate at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support summary.
41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Academic Success and Professional Development Plan)
The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.
36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.
0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.
The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric
