Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE

This article covers Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE, Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Assignment.

Here's What You'll Learn

Permalink: https://thestudycorp.com/physical-assessments-among-school-aged-children

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Assignment

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child assignment

Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE

The physical assessment of school-aged children should entail a complete head-to-toe examination or comprehensive exam of each body system. The vital signs, height, weight, and mid-upper arm circumference is monitored for all ages (Chiocca, 2010). Blood pressure monitoring requires the use of a different cuff depending on the child’s age and mid-arm circumference. A vision test is performed with a Snellen’s chart, and the child should be assessed for strabismus, nystagmus and the range of eye movements (Chiocca, 2010). A dental exam should be done for all children; 6-8-year-olds should be assessed for the eruption of secondary teeth and shedding of primary teeth (Chiocca, 2010). Children aged 9-12 year are examined for dental cavities or delay in the growth of secondary teeth.

When assessing a school-aged child, I would modify the assessment approach by starting with the assessment of the body parts that require the child to cooperate (Press, 2015). For instance, if the child has respiratory symptoms, I will begin with assessing the nose, chest, lungs, and heart and finalize with the musculoskeletal system. Besides, painful procedures will be done last, and I will explain to the child the discomfort associated with the assessment or procedure and the time it will last before proceeding (Press, 2015). If the child had a complaint of pain in a specific body, I would examine the area last to avoid discomfort in the entire assessment. For the younger child aged 5-7 years, I will encourage the caregiver to be present or to hold them to promote cooperation (Press, 2015). Furthermore, I will ensure I screen the child during the examination and instruct the child to uncover only the part that is being examined and re-clothe it to avoid embarrassment and discomfort.

Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Assignment Instructions

The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide An abstract/thesis is required. Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child Assignment.

NRS 434 Classroom Policy

Description

Online Classrooms-

Grand Canyon University requires all students enrolled in an online course to attend every week. This attendance is marked by activity in the online classroom. An online week for undergraduate students is Monday through Sunday. Students are not permitted to be out of attendance more than two consecutive, online weeks. An administrative withdrawal will be processed should a student be out of attendance for more than two consecutive, online weeks.

Assignment Submissions-

See also  The Impact of Standardized Nursing Terminology

All assignments should be submitted through the drop box in the learning management system as Word documents with extensions of .doc or .docx unless otherwise indicated in the assignment description. Written assignments of 500 words or more are required to be submitted to Lopeswrite before submitting to the Assignments drop box in the learning management system, thus allowing students to make adjustments prior to submitting the final version for grading.

Late Policy-

All assignments are due before midnight Arizona time on the due dates indicated. Assignments posted after the indicated due dates will be subject to a deduction of 10% of the available points for each day late. No assignment can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class. Technical issues are not valid excuses for late work unless the problem stems from GCU servers. Exceptions to this policy are at the discretion of the instructor.

Class Participation-

Participating in classroom discussion is paramount to the learning experience. Participating in the weekly discussions allows students and instructors to share experiences, investigate complicated subject matter, share expertise, and examine the content from new perspectives. The qualitative participation requirements are:

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)- You have 2 discussion questions each week. You are required to have a minimum of 250 words, with references for both of these questions. ****Note the overall word count on assignments does not count title or references pages for the minimum.
  • Students are to actively participate in the main forum for DQ at least 3/7 days a week, responding to other posts to total a minimum of at least 6References and research articles are to be used to qualify as substantial posts.
  • Follow-up responses to classmates’ initial answers or responses that integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject, offering a personal observation or experience, or referencing real-world examples, current events, or presenting current research on the topic. Peer responses- These are the 6 minimum responses you have to your peers per week. This is in addition to both DQs (which is graded seperatly). These responses must have a min. of 125 words for each of the required 6 responses. You can always do more responses with as many for few words as you would like.
  • Classroom interaction demonstrating deeper or broader thoughts beyond rephrasing what the textbook has presented on the topic.
  • Responses encouraging further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.
  • Asking additional, relevant questions about the week’s topic.
  • Communications that are presented in a professional and supportive manner, and with respectful tone in the online classroom.

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-434VN NRS-434VN-O505 Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child 110.0

Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (89.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%)
Content 80.0%
Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children 25.0% A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted. An incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies. A general comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or accuracy. A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is described. Some information is needed for clarity. A detailed comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age children.

Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age 25.0% The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity. The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and thoroughly described.

Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg) 30.0% A child assessment based on a developmental theory is omitted. A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies. A child assessment based on a developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies. A child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some information is needed for clarity. A child assessment based on a developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.

See also  Capella University Proposed Change Strategy Executive Summary

Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child assignment

Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child – Rubric

Collapse All Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child – RubricCollapse All

Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children

27.5 points

Criteria Description

Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children

5. 5: Excellent

27.5 points

A detailed comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age children.

4. 4: Good

24.48 points

A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is described. Some information is needed for clarity.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.73 points

A general comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or accuracy.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

20.63 points

An incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE)

Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.

Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age

27.5 points

Criteria Description

Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age

5. 5: Excellent

27.5 points

The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and thoroughly described.

4. 4: Good

24.48 points

The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.

3. 3: Satisfactory

21.73 points

The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age of the child.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

20.63 points

The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant inaccuracies for the age of the child.

See also  Zell Kravinsky Assignment
1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described.

Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)

33 points

Criteria Description

Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)

5. 5: Excellent

33 points

A child assessment based on a developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.

4. 4: Good

29.37 points

A child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some information is needed for clarity.

3. 3: Satisfactory

26.07 points

A child assessment based on a developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

24.75 points

A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A child assessment based on a developmental theory is omitted.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE)

Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
Thesis Development and Purpose

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent

5.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. 4: Good

4.9 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.35 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.13 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent

5.5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. 4: Good

4.9 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.35 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.13 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

5.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

4.9 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.13 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE)

Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
Physical assessments among school-aged children sample
1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

2.2 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. 5: Excellent

2.2 points

All format elements are correct.

4. 4: Good

1.96 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory

1.74 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.65 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

3.3 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. 5: Excellent

3.3 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

2.94 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

2.61 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

2.47 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Assessment Description

Child abuse and maltreatment is not limited to a particular age—it can occur in the infant, toddler, preschool, and school-age years. Choose one of the four age groups and outline the types of abuse most commonly seen among children of that age. Describe warning signs and physical and emotional assessment findings the nurse may see that could indicate child abuse. Discuss cultural variations of health practices that can be misidentified as child abuse. Describe the reporting mechanism in your state and nurse responsibilities related to the reporting of suspected child abuse.

Assessment Description

Compare the physical assessment of a child to that of an adult. In addition to describing the similar/different aspects of the physical assessment, explain how the nurse would offer instruction during the assessment, how communication would be adapted to offer explanations, and what strategies the nurse would use to encourage engagement.

Read More: – Physical Assessments Among School-aged Children SAMPLE

https://thestudycorp.com/essay-examples/epidemiology-paper-assignment/

Does this Look Like Your Assignment? We Can do an Original Paper for you!

Have no Time to Write? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

Have a subject expert Write for You

Have a subject expert finish your paper for You

Edit My Paper For Me

Have an Expert Write Your Dissertation's Chapter

Popular Searches
AACN BSN Essentials And Your Future Practice Assignment Advanced Physical Assessment Arizona State University Capella University Capella University Personal Leadership Portrait Homework Chamberlain University characteristics of performance-driven team Designing a Plan for Outcome Evaluation Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards Discussion: Classified Nursing knowledge Discussion: Nursing Informatics-Eportfolio DNP Assignments Eleven Blue Men assignment ENERGY METABOLISM AND WEIGHT CONTROL ASSIGNMENT Grand Canyon University Health History and Interview Herzing University Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation Management Assignments Management Assignments Help Management Guides MSN Assignments NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills Non-Traditional Family Case Study NRSE 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations NSG6435 Practicum III Family Health – Pediatrics NURS6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology nursing care plans Nursing Care Plans Examples Oncological Disorders Personal Philosophy Of Nursing Paper Essay Assignment Population Health Research and PICOT Statement PTSD Reflection Models Self-Assessment of NLN Nurse Educator Core Competencies Solved essays Statistics Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies Student's Essays The Impact of Standardized Nursing Terminology The Iron Triangle Assignment Transformations of DIKW Walden University Week 6: Concepts of Endocrine Disorders When Patient Advocacy Meets Policy