Case Study, Chapter 14, Shock and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

This article covers Case Study, Chapter 14, Shock and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome.

Permalink: https://thestudycorp.com/essay-examples/multiple-organ-dysfunction-syndrome

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.

Case Study: Multiple Organ Dysfunction

Case Study: Multiple Organ Dysfunction

Case Study, Chapter 14, Shock and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

1. Adam Smith, 77 years of age, is a male patient who was admitted from a nursing home to the intensive care unit with septic shock secondary to urosepsis. The patient has a Foley catheter in place from the nursing home with cloudy greenish, yellow-colored urine with sediments. The nurse removes the catheter after obtaining a urine culture and replaces it with a condom catheter attached to a drainage bag since the patient has a history of urinary and bowel incontinence. The patient is confused, afebrile, and hypotensive with a blood pressure of 82/44 mm Hg. His respiratory rate is 28 breaths/min and the pulse oximeter reading is at 88% room air, so the physician ordered 2 to 4 L of oxygen per nasal cannula titrated to keep SaO2 greater than 90%. The patient responded to 2 L of oxygen per nasal cannula with a SaO2 of 92%. The patient has diarrhea. His blood glucose level is elevated at 160 mg/dL. The white blood count is 15,000 and the C-reactive protein, a marker for inflammation, is elevated. The patient is being treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and norepinephrine (Levophed) beginning at 2 mcg/min and titrated to keep systolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm Hg. A subclavian triple lumen catheter was inserted and verified by chest x-ray for correct placement. An arterial line was placed in the right radial artery to closely monitor the patient’s blood pressure during the usage of the vasopressor therapy.

What predisposed the patient to develop septic shock?

What potential findings would suggest that the patient’s septic shock is worsening from the point of admission?
The norepinephrine concentration is 16 mg in 250 mL of normal saline (NS). Explain how the nurse should administer the medication. What nursing implications are related to the usage of a vasoactive medication?
Explain why the effectiveness of a vasoactive medication decreases as the septic shock worsens. What treatment should the nurse anticipate to be obtained to help the patient?
Explain the importance for nutritional support for this patient and which type of nutritional support should be provided?
2. Carlos Adams was involved in a motor vehicle accident and suffered blunt trauma to his abdomen. Upon presentation to the emergency department, his vital signs are as follows: temperature, 100.9°F; heart rate, 120 bpm; respiratory rate, 20 breaths/min; and blood pressure, 90/54 mm Hg. His abdomen is firm, with bruising around the umbilicus. He is alert and oriented, but complains of dizziness when changing positions. The patient is admitted for management of suspected hypovolemic shock.The following orders are written for the patient:

See also  the character of shylock in merchant of venice

Place two large-bore IVs and infuse 0.9% NS at 125 mL/hr/line

Obtain complete blood count, serum electrolytes

Oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula

Type and cross for 4 units of blood

Flat plate of the abdomen STAT

(Learning Objectives 1, 4, and5)

Describe the pathophysiologic sequence of events seen with hypovolemic shock.
What are the major goals of medical management in this patient?
What is the rationale for placing two large-bore IVs?
What are advantages of using 0.9% NS in this patient?
What is the rationale for placing the patient in a modified Trendelenburg position?

Case Study: Multiple Organ Dysfunction

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

See also  Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

As you continue, thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us. (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome)

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome


Weekly ParticipationYour initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

See also  dramatic irony in hamlet

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Read More:

https://thestudycorp.com/essay-examples/maintaining-academic-integrity-by-avoiding-plagiarism/

Does this Look Like Your Assignment? We Can do an Original Paper for you!

Have no Time to Write? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

Have a subject expert Write for You

Have a subject expert finish your paper for You

Edit My Paper For Me

Have an Expert Write Your Dissertation's Chapter

Popular Searches
AACN BSN Essentials And Your Future Practice Assignment Advanced Physical Assessment Arizona State University Capella University Capella University Personal Leadership Portrait Homework Chamberlain University characteristics of performance-driven team Designing a Plan for Outcome Evaluation Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards Discussion: Classified Nursing knowledge Discussion: Nursing Informatics-Eportfolio DNP Assignments Eleven Blue Men assignment ENERGY METABOLISM AND WEIGHT CONTROL ASSIGNMENT Grand Canyon University Health History and Interview Herzing University Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation Management Assignments Management Assignments Help Management Guides MSN Assignments NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills Non-Traditional Family Case Study NRSE 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations NSG6435 Practicum III Family Health – Pediatrics NURS6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare through Technology nursing care plans Nursing Care Plans Examples Oncological Disorders Personal Philosophy Of Nursing Paper Essay Assignment Population Health Research and PICOT Statement PTSD Reflection Models Self-Assessment of NLN Nurse Educator Core Competencies Solved essays Statistics Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies Student's Essays The Impact of Standardized Nursing Terminology The Iron Triangle Assignment Transformations of DIKW Walden University Week 6: Concepts of Endocrine Disorders When Patient Advocacy Meets Policy